MatchMaker.com claims to be the “No1 Trusted Dating site for singles looking for love”. Ignoring the horrible formatting, we have to argue with that claim. Number one? Seriously? When we found a slew of fake profiles, profiles that might be real but use obviously fake pictures (we shouldn’t be able to recognize the porn star in a profile picture), and women we’d never want to date, we had to decide that MatchMaker.com is a site we definitely would not use if we wanted to find a date.
We did send out our messages, though, just in case something could prove us wrong. Nothing did. We set up absolutely no dates. If we’d set up even one, that would at least make MatchMaker.com the best of the sites we don’t recommend, but no such luck.
MatchMaker.com: Review Our Results Using The MatchMaker.com Site
Like we do with every dating site we test, we sent five hundred messages to five hundred different women over three months. It’s a good thing sending those messages takes about half an hour a day; otherwise, we’d have a completely wasted three months. As it is, we lost a few hours for nothing. Out of those five hundred messages, we got sixty-two replies. Twenty-eight of those were still more fake profiles, so we only really got thirty-four replies. That’s pathetic! It’s not even a seven percent return rate! That might be good for a financial investment, but for an investment of our time, when we’re trying to find a date, it’s absurdly bad. Worse is that none of those panned out with dates.
MatchMaker.com Issues: 3 Things MatchMaker.com Didn’t Do Well
The very first time we used MatchMaker.com told us it would probably be one of the sites we don’t recommend using. It’s been around since 1996, and the site shows it. The design isn’t terrible, but it runs so slowly that we could click a link, get up, make a sandwich, and come back to find the page nearly loaded. If you have the patience for that, more power to you, but we sure don’t.
Speaking of the first time, we discovered at that point that they’re still stuck in the Stone Age of the Interwebs; you have to make certain you include the “www.” before it. If you don’t, you’re going to end up on some site that doesn’t have a page and just tries to get you to download something. We thought about allowing it for about a tenth of a second before deciding we like our computers too much to risk them. Any up-to-date site would allow you to type the actual, non-www. part of the URL into the address bar and redirect properly, but MatchMaker.com is just too behind for that.
Another thing is that MatchMaker.com is for people thirty-five and up. No hate for middle-aged women, but they’re just not our thing. MatchMaker.com only tells you this in the footer text, where you probably won’t even check on most sites, since the form is at the top. It would be nice to know what we’re getting into and why we can’t find younger women before we run into the issue of how few and far between they are.
MatchMaker.com Review: Is MatchMaker.com Legit & Worth Joining?
MatchMaker.com has been around for seventeen years now. That’s pretty respectable. Presumably, that means they have people that use it. However, we have to suggest that you not be one of them. When we get a return rate of seven percent on messages and zero on setting up dates, it’s just not worth it. We suggest you try something else; check out Match or one of the other sites in our Top Five. You might actually meet someone there.